TF Swing nets 8+% return on this trade $81,000 profit on a $1 million allocation...continues wins. Please note that this contract does include the monday session and this system has been upgraded to RVS 2.0 as it installed on the trade servers.
Showing posts with label TF Daily Swing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TF Daily Swing. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Any unhedged short risk is now flat
Unhedged short risk...which reflects a few accounts - flat now. 1110 to 1091 for ES...on this trade.
For the record, on a conservative (small position size) allocation basis accounts are up 10% for the month with the daily systems. On an aggressive basis, meaning larger risk allocations as a percentage of liquidity, live accounts are up over 30% for the month.
For the record, on a conservative (small position size) allocation basis accounts are up 10% for the month with the daily systems. On an aggressive basis, meaning larger risk allocations as a percentage of liquidity, live accounts are up over 30% for the month.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Flat ES and TF
If people have questions about the recent trades...these are two accounts showing the actual real results for ES and TF swing systems. These are not the trend following systems. (Click on the image for a detailed view)
Friday, July 16, 2010
System Position Update
Below are the results of the swing system trades. Currently, this exit represents a hedge-point for the newest release of RVS and portfolios are hedged to limit the risk for the current trade. The trend following enhancements to the RVS model are now holding the short position till its deemed to be expired. Then the position will be closed. This means that the trade could extend for quite some time. I would like to add that though I have been using this blog to communicate with clients I will not be publishing all the trades or the latest model triggers via a public blog. It has been a very good mechanism to confirm, communicate and reference live and funded trades. We allocated around $50,000,000 on the ES trade, while the TF trade which took 35 points on this run, had around $20,000,000 allocated. I do think we were effective during very challenging markets.
This weekend I am releasing the updates to RVS and additionally, I am releasing some amazingly powerful forex systems with outstanding risk and targeting controls. We will be allocating a large amount of our assets to the forex markets, which I am excited about, but has also been very demanding from a development perspective.
Regarding my take on the markets, I see a possibility for a bounce and the new RVS method sees this as a hedge-point, however, I reiterate my comments regarding the dollar and the markets as a whole, therefore, I expect to be much much lower over the near-term. And as I pointed out on Wednesday, the market cycle is a very large hurdle to overcome. If prices were to over come that cycle in the 1100 area in the ES I would view that as a significant achievement.
In so far as I can be helpful, I will try to keep updates on my blog regarding the major inflection points in the markets - as I have done recently. However, there is reason for me to potentially a private (though not charged) blog where I can ensure a constructive and positive interaction on a proprietary basis.
Today, i found the following chart on THEMAXFACTOR blog: 

Max has used my charts in the past and apparently possesses, at the young age of 15 in Switzerland (where apparently you don't have to go to school and you can spend all day trading the markets), the capability to produce high quality trades. Max made some very good comments regarding draw downs and risks and I appreciate that he has consistently reference my charts on his blog. This goes back to my previous posts regarding allocation amounts. However, what Max may have achieved in confidence/arrogance has not been matched by analytical ability.
I would like to point out that one of the nice characteristics of these systems, especially the dailys is that they take the smallest positions early and the largest late. In the ES system we built a 20 contract position in the model (which trades live) with an initial 2 contract entry. This ensures in fact the the drawdown risk is significantly reduced and enabled an average price in the 1070's, which will look like a great fill when looked at several months from now. Therefore, the point regarding being deep in the red is curious and misguided. The market situation has been in a highly dangerous posture and may or may not have made it to ideal levels to short, this is why an initial position is initiated and the positions are built in the manner that they are. Additionally, there is a self assessed performance analysis and risk analysis basis for these systems to self-manage their trading risks, probabilities and allocation sizes based on their performance in the markets that they trade. This has been a considerable effort for me to build but is very exciting and has opened tremendous opportunities in markets that make the TF and ES look calm, Forex and commodities for instance. I do recommend that Max demonstrate more of what his most intriguing post and concept are as he seems to follow them very well as can be easily seen via the portfolio shown below.
As most market participants know, trading and arrogance are not bedfellows though they are common occurrences and it seems even in Switzerland. For an example of "garbage in and garbage out", I highly recommend looking at Max's trades and his portfolio which has taken quite a few 50% draw downs lately and did not fare welll today...(included below) It is easy to know what to do when you don't have to do it. Its also easy to back date posts or post trades in posterity, As I have real money trading and real clients, I am keen to share the good and the bad and I have an interest in presenting thing in a way that builds a understanding and integrity, therefore, I make a deliberate effort to leave my posts unchanged and also post information as I it develops with no filter. I do hope that this effort is obvious.
So, shorting the ES in the 1070's certainly was reasonable and trade risks within reasonable tolerances. The advantage of trading a daily system like this is that you are not likely to get into situations, like BP, where you catch the knife for 50% haircuts. This is also the reason, that I like to allocate 10 to 30% of the equity in an account to risk positions rather than more and also why I focus on index trading for equity style investments.
I have been overwhelmed with the recent development efforts and enhancements fto the RVS/HLA and Cycle models and risk management systems - which have been a mind numbing process of refactoring, rewriting and re-architecting and finally reimplementing the derived model functionality, trade controller and risk management infrastructure - a few times. Usually just about when I thought I was nearly totally done. This combined with fairly substantial capital allocation/management decisions has left me practically no time and mostly no energy to follow through on personal and exploratory opportunities (Vimal among a few others please accept my apologies)
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Friday, July 9, 2010
TF Daily Swing system takes short - ES adds short contracts and comments
Market feels like it has been in full blown bounce mode prior to earnings season. Perhaps shorts profit taking or being squeezed prior to earnings season is contributing to the rise. However, I would like to point out that internals continue to be terrible. People have been selling leveraged risk all the way up on this bounce - and that is a really bad omen. You can see that in the reDeleverage analysis of SPY and BGU below. The leveraged BGU (gray bars) is selling at a discount to the cash SPY index and the trend has been increasing. This version of the analysis is a longer term view than the normal version that I generally show.
Apparently, Jon Paulson (Steve Cohen etc...among others) are long everything that can be found - I am betting that that decision is based more on the same kind of gut move that got him into all those abacus CDS shorts than fundamentals or sound judgement (though that former idea had a fundamentals basis and required gut not to mention help from Goldman Tax and friends)...can't help but wonder about it this time. What happens to the market when a few over leveraged 30 billion firms are wrong?
In any case, the subject of sentiment is an integrally related issue and the above demonstrates that sentiment is still bullish. Theory says that the market is not bullish enough for a big selloff based on a bullish percent of 18% or so. I think there is reason to believe that we have not really bounced and have not reached enough of a bearish extreme appropriate for a substantial rally given overall market conditions.
I would like to point out a few things:
- The above comments regarding long positioned institutions/HF's demonstrates that we have probably not gotten bearish enough to rally. Nor have we reached extreme bearishness either...something you would have expected to see with nasty volatility like has occurred. In addition, after the volatility that has occurred in market since may - to the point of panic - the market has become virtually untradable for most participants. I know of a few funds that do not have the choice to trade anymore due to all of the insanity. So, I think we have been too complacent to put in a bounce of significance.
- In addition, the concept of A-B-C down does not fit well on the weekly chart of the SPX. It does not measure well without a new low and a new low will most likely setup a larger down move not a C.
- Overall, very interesting action on very low volume with nearly every leveraged ETF risk trade being sold at a discount to cash in every market I have checked.
- In addition, we still have big relative strength discrepancies in major markets/sectors that should be showing strength right now...and distributive internals.
- If the market were to attempt to rally further, there is quite a lot of "50 day MA" resistance above nearly every one.
I think that its important to consider that the market has just not gotten bearish enough. And its at moments like these that its easy to miss big trades or get caught wrong footed. Just some food for thought.
One other point, Monday's have been bullish and responsible for over 80% of the entire points gained since March 2009...perhaps just to fool everyone the market magicians will start bullish Friday's and Monday Madness. Start watching the historical Monday's.
I am doing a substantial new release this weekend of all the RVS and HLA systems. The last trade is slightly different due to the changes but essentially the same performance stats. TF System shorts the close as expected and ES System adds.Wednesday, July 7, 2010
TF Daily Swing system update
As a follow up to my earlier post. I would like to add that many of my other systems are beginning the process of building short positions. Additionally, I wanted to put today's loss in perspective for the TF system. This market has whipped around almost everyone except the the best short term systems or the best discretionary traders....and the front-running HFT, Goldman Sachs, JPM, Morgan Stanley etc guys. The Russell Daily swing system is right on plan and should continue to produce good results. This loss is NOT a drawdown it is in fact a well managed trade. The market may possibly probe a little higher tomorrow in the AM but its looking rather like there may just be too many optimists out there. Today, of-course, was a classic short squeeze, lets see if its a bull-trap. I personally suspect it is.
Below is the equity curve including the last trade which gave back around $18,000. This is a good example of how to trade with proper allocations. Trading with systems that give you too many stop outs create the same amount of risk as systems that take too many drawdowns. People's perceptions related to these elements are usually too optimistic. In this model, assigned risk capital is $50,000 and the average trade size is $20,000 or so. Today, we closed a loss on a trade that is equivalent to the average trade size. This loss represents 36% of the at risk capital but the at risk capital represents 20% to 40% of a reasonable allocation. Therefore, to trade this system with $50,000 max trade size in leveraged futures markets the allocation should be roughly $250,000 to $300,000. This loss therefore represents a 5 to 7% move in this allocation. It is common for people to over leverage. Trading involves risk, you do not get paid for feeding the ducks, so you need to think about risk in perspective to an account basis. Given that, we also need to understand that the position taken by this system on the last trade represented about $780,000 of notional equity. That's quite a lot of market exposure. While the system is remarkably successful and trade with 95% winning trades since inception, if one were to freak out over a $15,000 to $18,000 is not because the system is not trading well its related to being over allocated in relation to liquid assets. The results below, therefore demonstrate, an average trade size of less than $20,000 with a max trade size of $50,000 since the inception of the TF futures contracts. There is no reinvestment of profits or compounding. The results represent an annualized return of 26% based on a reasonable allocation of risk capital. Given that at anytime the capital in the market is less than 7% of asset allocation...these results are all the more attractive.
I recommend that people think carefully about how much money they are placing into the market and how much of their liquid assets are required to generate a return. It is my impression that most money managers are WAY over allocated to risk assets.
Below is the equity curve including the last trade which gave back around $18,000. This is a good example of how to trade with proper allocations. Trading with systems that give you too many stop outs create the same amount of risk as systems that take too many drawdowns. People's perceptions related to these elements are usually too optimistic. In this model, assigned risk capital is $50,000 and the average trade size is $20,000 or so. Today, we closed a loss on a trade that is equivalent to the average trade size. This loss represents 36% of the at risk capital but the at risk capital represents 20% to 40% of a reasonable allocation. Therefore, to trade this system with $50,000 max trade size in leveraged futures markets the allocation should be roughly $250,000 to $300,000. This loss therefore represents a 5 to 7% move in this allocation. It is common for people to over leverage. Trading involves risk, you do not get paid for feeding the ducks, so you need to think about risk in perspective to an account basis. Given that, we also need to understand that the position taken by this system on the last trade represented about $780,000 of notional equity. That's quite a lot of market exposure. While the system is remarkably successful and trade with 95% winning trades since inception, if one were to freak out over a $15,000 to $18,000 is not because the system is not trading well its related to being over allocated in relation to liquid assets. The results below, therefore demonstrate, an average trade size of less than $20,000 with a max trade size of $50,000 since the inception of the TF futures contracts. There is no reinvestment of profits or compounding. The results represent an annualized return of 26% based on a reasonable allocation of risk capital. Given that at anytime the capital in the market is less than 7% of asset allocation...these results are all the more attractive.
I recommend that people think carefully about how much money they are placing into the market and how much of their liquid assets are required to generate a return. It is my impression that most money managers are WAY over allocated to risk assets.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
Thursday, July 1, 2010
TF Daily Swing Adds another entry
Certainly this trade has been interesting to say the least. This is the last entry that I believe the system will take.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
TF Daily Swing results over 10 years
To put the current trade in perspective...below is the PL for trade decisions with average trade of $20,000 for this example with the Russell futures.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Russell 2000 Futures Update
Above is the current status of the TF Daily Swing System. It has not added to its long position as you can see. This is a countertrend trade with mixed views among key systems, therefore, position sizes are reduced. I am confident that the system will handle this trade as respectably as possible and will be looking for entries for shorts sometime soon.
I have not been updating the blog that frequently because I have just moved and am getting things setup additionally to working on a significant release of my trade control software and risk management interface within the module.
I have not been updating the blog that frequently because I have just moved and am getting things setup additionally to working on a significant release of my trade control software and risk management interface within the module.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
Friday, June 25, 2010
TF Swing System Adds To Long Position
I apologize for the getting this out late...but I have been moving both my office and home so yesterday and today (actually this week) have been crazy.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
TF Daily Swing Triggers Long at current levels
What a whacked out market...well, looks like the next short, probably in July will be the one to watch.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Market update
I would like to reiterate the status of the market is BIAS SHORT. However, we are at major support levels, if they hold then the systems are setup to short a significant bounce. That bounce, ironically would be a right shoulder. I am watching these daily swing systems closely. I believe that when they call the short it will be doozey...I will post that short when it happens...here are the charts for your reference.
I would like to point out that for some reason in the trade stats...I lost the margin requirements therefore the position sizes are not reflected correctly....meaning avgSize and minSize and maxSize...all else is correct. I have included a chart which reflect the system stats correctly below. Click on it for a detailed view.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
TF Daily Swing LR Exits
Along with all the other equity systems that were long...the TF and UWM systems are flat exiting a very nice trade indeed.
Labels:
TF Daily Swing
Strategies Update
Looking to sell long positions at the close...this is not confirmed but looks probably at this point.
Friday, May 21, 2010
Thursday, May 20, 2010
SPY Rich but bounce conditions starting to emerge
Systems will not add longs...as seend by the red titel...systems will look for shorts to sell.
I do think we get a bounce from these levels...these particular systems almost never lose on their trades. Also, One thing of note is that the TNA is now trading cheap vs TZA...so there is starting to be some traction possible for a rebound.
I do think we get a bounce from these levels...these particular systems almost never lose on their trades. Also, One thing of note is that the TNA is now trading cheap vs TZA...so there is starting to be some traction possible for a rebound.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


























